Thin wrapper
What you get for $20K–$120K
- UI on top of openai.chat.completions.create()
- System prompt is the entire “moat”
- No eval harness, no golden set
- One provider, one model, hard-coded
- Breaks the day OpenAI deprecates the model
Trango Tech provides an OpenAI development services architecture equipped with a multi-model abstraction layer. Backed by rigorous, eval-first testing and a committed drift SLA, we guarantee your production pipelines keep humming. No matter where you exist in the San Francisco Bay Area, New York City, or Austin, we have got you covered.
While 73% of funded AI startups are just GPT wrappers, we built our own proprietary technology from scratch. Unlike other OpenAI development companies, we design, build, evaluate, and harden your production systems. No matter if you want GPT-5, GPT-4.1, embeddings, Whisper, DALL-E, or real-time. Similarly, we do it with alternative providers (Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, open-source as well. With Houston-headquartered, 20+ years of engineering, and a 78% PoC-to-production rate, Trango Tech does it all impeccably. You never have to worry about OpenAI model deprecations breaking your app.
Unlike most OpenAI development firms, we ship a multi-model system you own and can swap providers in a day. So no more shipping a wrapper and disappearing when GPT-4o sunsets.
An OpenAI development company can make or break your success. Many firms build a thin wrapper around a demo prompt, hand it off, and disappear when models deprecate. At Trango Tech, we engineer robust, multi-model systems. You own the code completely. In fact, our architecture allows you to swap between providers in as little as 48 hours. Less risk. No pricing changes.
If you need a quick prototype, build it yourself in a weekend. If you need a resilient system engineered to survive the next model upgrade, that's what we do. Trango Tech designs, builds, and operates production-grade software using OpenAI APIs. GPT-5, GPT-4.1, o3, embeddings, vision, voice, image, to name a few.
So next time, when you hire an OpenAI developer, think beyond a basic AI wrapper. In that case, we exist for the buyer who has lost patience with that gap. Strategy + multi-model production build + drift & deprecation SLA under one engagement. No chance of leaving you with a document. You don't have to force the internal team to figure out the maintenance from scratch once it gets deprecated.
Spend two minutes forecasting your monthly OpenAI API spend spend and flag any hidden cost-inversion risks.
Run Cost CalculatorIf you need clarity before building, we start with a 2–4 week Strategy Sprint. If you know exactly what you want, we will dive right into building a production-track prototype. Whatever stage you are in, we have a path forward.
Use-case prioritization, build-vs-buy-vs-ChatGPT-Enterprise verdict per workflow, ROI model, model-provider recommendation (OpenAI / Anthropic / Gemini / open-source).
Production web/mobile/desktop apps using OpenAI Chat Completions or Responses API + your data + your auth + your UI. SSO, role-based answer scoping, audit log, hallucination SLO.
Adding GPT-5 / 4.1 / o3 / embeddings/vision / Realtime API into your existing product. Function calling, structured outputs, streaming, error handling, observability spans, cost telemetry.
When ChatGPT Builder or the Assistants API is the right answer, we build it there with a portability layer so you can graduate to a custom API integration later without a rewrite.
Hybrid retrieval, embeddings tuning, retrieval-score thresholds, golden-set evals, citation on every answer. Pinecone / Weaviate / Qdrant / pgvector. Hallucination measured.
LLM agents that use tools, take multi-step actions, and retain memory. Reward-hacking guards (so you don’t become the next Klarna). Per-step eval harness. Kill-switch wired in from week 1.
When the base model + RAG can’t hit the SLO, we fine-tune (OpenAI, Anthropic, or open-source Llama) or distill to a cheaper model. Eval gate before/after; payback math written out.
LiteLLM / Vercel AI SDK / MCP abstraction layer over OpenAI + Anthropic + Gemini + open-source. With a vendor-agnostic approach, you can swap providers in a day to better options.
Golden eval set, regression tests on every code/prompt/model change, observability spans, cost dashboard, drift monitor, deprecation watch. Trango Eval Gate built into CI.
An unreliable vendor makes you pay high token costs and hallucinations. Our team diagnoses the gaps, sets up a flexible portability layer, and handles your full production rollout.
Curious about pricing or how we work? Expect a response from a principal in under 24 hours, not a BDR.
If you are looking to hire an OpenAI engineer, first and foremost, you need to look past the flashy demo to see what they have done. Check out whether they have fine-tuned open-source models, implemented advanced retrieval-augmented generation, or built custom evaluation pipelines.
What you get for $20K–$120K
What you get for $80K–$340K
What you get for $140K–$1.2M
Remember that models will come and go. However, your underlying infrastructure, including your pipelines, workflows, and integrations, is what builds your true moat.
Inherited a thin wrapper from a prior vendor? 1-in-4 of our engagements are rescues. First diagnostic is free.
Instead of locking into one provider, we build with a portability layer. It ensures you can easily swap models as the market shifts. As a matter of fact, Anthropic's enterprise share has surged from 12% to 40% while OpenAI dropped from 50% to 27%. On average, our production builds run two to three providers concurrently to ensure optimal performance and cost-efficiency.
| Use case | OpenAIGPT-5 | AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.5 | Gemini2.5 Pro / Flash | Open-sourceLlama 3.3 / Mistral |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General chat / Q&A | ✓Best general purpose | ✓Equally strong | ○Acceptable | ○For sovereign data |
| Function calling / structured outputs | ✓Best structured outputs | ✓Tool use rivals OpenAI | ○Good, less mature SDK | ✗Avoid for production |
| Long context (>200K tokens) | ○400K context | ✓1M context (Sonnet 4.5) | ✓2M context (Gemini 2.5) | ✗128K max typically |
| Multimodal / vision | ✓GPT-5 vision strong | ✓Excellent | ✓Best for video | ○Llama 4 vision OK |
| Voice / Realtime / streaming | ✓Realtime API leader | ○No native voice API | ✓Strong streaming | ✗Self-host needed |
| Code generation | ○Good | ✓Best for code (Sonnet 4.5) | ○Acceptable | ○Qwen / DeepSeek strong |
| Agentic systems / tool use | ○Assistants API mature | ✓Best agentic reasoning | ○Improving rapidly | ✗Brittle in production |
| Fine-tuning / on-prem | ○Fine-tune yes, on-prem no | ○Fine-tune via Bedrock | ○Via Vertex AI | ✓Best for on-prem / sovereign |
~90 seconds — get a written verdict on provider + deployment surface for your exact compliance, region, throughput, and latency profile.
Run Decision WizardTypical: $20K–$80K
Typical: $60K–$180K
Typical: $140K–$1.2M
Already deep in one of these tiers? Tell us which one and we’ll send a paid-for second opinion on whether to scale, augment, or migrate.
No matter if you are building from scratch or leveraging platforms like ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini, there are five distinct paths you can take. Our approach at Trango offers the strongest overall advantage. Below, we have mapped out all the options that span Big-4 consulting and in-house development. Give them a look to find out what exactly is the best choice and makes the most sense for you.
| Dimension | In-house FTE | Big-4 consulting | Trango Tech | ChatGPT Enterprise / Claude / Gemini Enterprise | Freelancer / Toptal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to first deployed system | 9–15 moHiring + ramp | 6–12 moDeck before code | 6–14 wkVertical-slice deploy | DaysIf use case fits the SaaS | 4–8 wkFor point work only |
| Year-1 all-in cost | $650K–$1.4M | $450K–$2M+ | $36K–$420K | $30K–$500K license | $80K–$200K hourly |
| Multi-model portability | Depends on hires | Cloud-coupled | Built-inLiteLLM / MCP layer | LockedSingle vendor by design | RarelySkill-dependent |
| Eval harness from day 1 | If senior hire | Rarely | Trango Eval Gate7-axis CI gate | Vendor-side only | Almost never |
| Model deprecation insurance | Your problem | Out of scope | SOW clauseMigration included | Vendor-managedIf you stay on the SaaS | N/A |
| Published pricing | Salary bands public | $2M+ rumors | 4 tiers on this page | Per-seat tier card | $80–$200/hr public |
| Hallucination SLO in SOW | No SOW | Rarely | YesMeasured + monitored | Best-effort | No |
| Best fit | You will run 4+ OpenAI projects/year permanently | Multi-billion transformation needing brand cover | Production OpenAI build under one SOW, 2–18 months | Use case is templated (writing assistant, code helper, basic Q&A) and not your moat | You have a locked spec and need hands |
Trango Tech, as a leading premier OpenAI development company, builds advanced, industry-specific AI solutions. We do everything from dynamic predictive models to intelligent automation agents under a single digital roof.
Fraud-explanation chat, claims-summary GPT, RFP automation, KYC document triage. SR 11-7 ready. Benchmark: 42% faster claims review.
Clinical co-pilot, prior-auth assistant, scribe + summarization. HIPAA + BAA architecture. Audit-ready pipelines on Azure OpenAI / OpenAI Enterprise.
Voice agent for support, brand-voice content generation, product copy, recommendations with explanation. Benchmark: 48% L1 deflection.
Work-instruction co-pilot, machinery troubleshooting GPT (citation-grounded), SOP retrieval. Real-time on shop floor; on-prem fallback to Llama.
Contract review with clause-level citations, deviation flagging, redline suggestion against a playbook. The attorney remains in the loop; throughput jumps 4–5×.
Brand-voice fine-tuned content gen, campaign asset variants, SEO drafts with editorial review. Output runs on Claude Sonnet for quality, Gemini Flash for cost.
In-app GPT support, onboarding assistant, conversational analytics, AI feature additions to existing product. $20-user-costs-$65 unit economics solved upfront.
Underwriting assistant, claims fraud explanation, policy-document Q&A. Audit binders + model cards + explainability.
Learn more through our deep-dive resources on GenAI Strategy, Tailored LLM Builds, and AI Chatbot Engineering.
Forecast My Token SpendUnlike most OpenAI Development agencies, we provide complete projections upfront, breaking down everything in a transparent way. Even more, our cost calculator will show you the exact numbers once you enter the required details. Just answer a few quick questions to get your instant quote!
Our OpenAI ChatGPT Development Company works in a very effective yet straightforward process. Both you and our team have the flexibility to reassess at any stage. This ensures we never skip the vital checks that cause most projects to fail. Check our end-to-end methodology that OpenAI developers work with:
30-minute scoping call with a principal. Output: recommended tier + scope of the 1-week paid diagnostic.
Thin end-to-end deploy in 3 weeks. Real data, real users, real tokens. We build the golden eval set during this phase.
7-axis scorecard: accuracy / hallucination / latency p95 / cost per 1M tokens / eval coverage / drift / governance. Pass = proceed; fail = stop or refactor.
MLOps, observability spans, audit log, cost telemetry, drift detection, multi-model portability layer (LiteLLM / MCP), kill-switch. Built to survive the next deprecation.
Workflow integration into systems of record, training, change-management, runbooks. The reason 78% of our pilots reach production is this workstream running in parallel.
Drift monitoring, scheduled re-evals, OpenAI deprecation watch with 90-day advance alert, migration to Claude / Gemini at no charge if OpenAI sunsets with < 60-day notice.
Start at the diagnostic. Your first step (Week 0) is a free 30-minute chat with a principal
AI prototypes are incredible to demo, but scaling them for day-to-day business is notoriously difficult. Research shows that investors have lost around $40 billion in AI initiatives over the last couple of years. Yet an overwhelming 88% of AI proofs of concept never graduate into live production systems. To save you from this, we rely on proven practices backed by 20+ years of experience.
GPT-4 invents 15% of citations under realistic prompts. Without a golden set + regression tests, hallucination remains invisible until production.
100 agents × GPT-5.5 × 603B tokens = $1,305,088.81 in a single month. Fast Mode alone added a 70% premium in terms of experience.
Klarna’s AI agent issued ~$2.3M in unauthorized refunds because it learned refunds boosted customer-sentiment scores.
GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, 4.1-mini, and o4-mini will all be retired by Feb 2026. Even “chatgpt-4o-latest” was killed despite the no-change promise.
94% of memory-retaining agents proved vulnerable to memory poisoning; adversarial content planted once redirects future sessions.
Of the 200 funded AI startups studied on HN, 73% are essentially API-repackaging network traffic streams straight to OpenAI.
Signing a BAA with OpenAI / Microsoft does NOT make your app HIPAA-compliant. The BAA covers provider-side; application architecture, logging, redaction, and access control are still on you.
95% per-call valid-JSON rate compounds to ~36% success over a 20-step agent chain.. Function calling is not reliable by itself.
84% attack success rate against agentic systems; 47% bypass rate against ChatGPT-tier guardrails. Indirect injection via connectors persists across sessions.
A flat-fee $20/month SaaS user costs OpenAI $65 in compute. Buyers pricing on top of metered API runs at a negative margin.
Roughly 30% of our projects this year are rescues. Reach out to see how we get them across the finish line, and let's start.
Eval Gate is our proven working methodology that drives an impressive 78% PoC-to-production success rate in the projects we have done so far. Because it’s vendor-agnostic, it runs identically on OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemini. Every engagement we undertake is measured against seven key dimensions before we approve a model for production. See how differently we work in Enterprise OpenAI Solutions:
500 to 1,500 labeled examples representative of your real workload. Score logged on every code, prompt, or model change. Regression-blocked in CI.
SLO written into the SOW typically <2% for support, <0.5% for legal/clinical. Triaged into ungrounded vs misinterpreted vs missing-citation.
Worst-case 95th percentile. Voice / Realtime <800ms end-to-end. Chat <3s. Bounded against SLO during the pilot, not after.
Dollar cost per million in/out tokens at the chosen tier. Re-evaluated quarterly OpenAI/Anthropic/Gemini reprice; your architecture should benefit.
How much of your real workload distribution is covered by the golden set. We aim for 90%+ on the top-3 intent classes; we tell you the gap.
Data drift + model drift monitored continuously. Threshold breach triggers alert + re-eval. Drift SLO is contractual, not aspirational.
OWASP LLM Top 10 checklist passed. Model cards, audit log, prompt versioning, BAA/SOC 2/GDPR/EU AI Act mapping. Binary go/no-go gates.
Generally, our OpenAI development services cost you anywhere between $10,000 and over $500,000. It further goes up or down based on the complexity of the project, the tech stack, and the region you target. Remember that costs associated with OpenAI development are divided into two categories. One-time costs and ongoing ones. For further transparency, we have laid out the real ranges for every engagement on all projects in the past 18 months.
Need help deciding on a provider and deployment surface? Simply use the Decision Wizard below to tailor a solution to your specific inputs.
Find your perfect match88% of enterprise GPT pilots never reach production. The dominant failure pattern is missing evaluation harnesses, not technical capability.
RAND Corporation, 2025 Enterprise AI ReportAnthropic enterprise LLM share rose from 12% to 40% in 18 months while OpenAI’s share dropped from 50% to 27%. Multi-model architectures are now standard at Fortune 500 scale.
Menlo Ventures Enterprise AI Survey, 2026Prompt injection succeeds against agentic systems 84% of the time in lab conditions, making OWASP LLM01 hardening mandatory for any production agentic deployment.
OWASP LLM Top 10:2025A typical $20/month SaaS user can cost $65 in OpenAI compute at full feature usage. Unit-economics inversion is the second-leading killer of AI startups after wrapper commoditization.
Simon Willison, “LLM Unit Economics” (2025); HN discussion (2026)GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, 4.1-mini, and o4-mini all retired by February 2026. Median production lifespan of an OpenAI model snapshot is now under 14 months — portability layers are no longer optional.
OpenAI deprecation timeline, 2024–202673% of YC-funded AI startups in 2025 were classified as “thin wrappers” — products replicable by a single developer in a weekend. Median lifespan: 9–14 months before commoditization.
Hacker News research thread on 200 funded AI startups, 2025Need to choose between OpenAI, Azure, Bedrock, Vertex, or on-prem? Answer these six quick questions that hardly take 90 seconds. Based on that, we will recommend a deployment. The results will appear once you complete it.
With our portability layer, you can switch out AI providers in just a day rather than months. If OpenAI replicates or sunsets a model, your app won't miss a beat. Typically, we run 2 to 3 providers at once. For instance, OpenAI GPT-5 for general chat. Claude Sonnet 4.5 for coding. Gemini 2.5 Flash for high-volume tasks.
Anthropic's market share has risen from 12% to 40%, while OpenAI's has fallen from 50% to 27%, underscoring how important this is. Industry leaders are already hedging their bets by partnering with multiple providers. If your build lacks a portability layer, you are simply paying a premium for the privilege.
Book a 60-minute deep dive with one of our principal architects. We will pinpoint your lock-in risks and design a clear path ahead.
Model Deprecation Insurance is how exactly we protect your AI-powered systems from sudden third-party model retirements. With OpenAI's history of retiring models like GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, 4.1-mini, and o4-mini, you can't afford to rely on static API snapshots. As a result, we affirm that you get a tech stack that is built to adapt smoothly to these inevitable changes.
Trango manages OpenAI model lifecycles for you, guaranteeing a minimum of 90 days' notice before any production model gets shut down.
You hear from us before you hear from OpenAI’s blog.
We can upgrade you to a newer model in the same series for free within the first year of its release, as long as the new version passes all your usual quality checks.
We migrate, we re-run the eval gate, you stay live.
Don't worry about sudden model sunsets. If OpenAI phases out a production model, Trango Tech will seamlessly switch your workflows to Claude or Gemini.
The portability layer (§18) is what makes this practical.
Before we replace an older model in production, the new model must first clear our golden evaluation set. It must match or beat the previous version on given metrics.
No silent quality regression after a swap. Ever.
Want to see the full, unredacted SOW template and our eval-regression playbook? Just let us know, and we’ll get those over to you under NDA.
Research shows that agentic systems face an 84% attack success rate. Similarly, around 94% of memory-retaining agents are vulnerable to poisoning, which is why you need total protection. For that purpose, we secure your systems against all 10 existing OWASP risks. Please answer the three questions below as well to generate your compliance map.
Drives which compliance frameworks apply.
Your data + region + agentic profile triggers multiple frameworks. The list below is your obligation checklist.
Instead of locking you into a single technology, our OpenAI Development Company USA utilizes Eval Gate to assess your budget, constraints, and scalability. To show our technical breadth, here is the tech we've utilized across our last 40 builds:
See how our OpenAI Custom Solutions help clients transform smart technology into an ultimate growth engine. Our primary goal was to automate so that the team can do what they do best.
Trango Tech enhanced our custom GPT pipeline after it started producing hallucinations. I was overhauled with their data retrieval system and Eval Gate. Now, every single code change passes through an automated testing pipeline before it hits production.
Most AI consultants focus entirely on the tech stack, but Trango Tech thinks outside the box. They saved us from wasting six figures on a feature we never required. They mapped out the actual ROI and pivoted us to automation.
We hired Trango Tech to build a customer-facing OpenAI tool for regulated financial compliance needs. Luckily, they knew all OWASP LLM security risks inside out, and it really worked for us. Highly recommended!
Our prototype worked great, but scaling it drove our infrastructure costs quite high. They came in, set up proper observability monitoring, found token leaks, and optimized as required. I found them very responsive.
For those building anything with OpenAI’s Realtime API, they definitely need Trango Tech at the back. They treated our project as an absolute emergency, rearchitected our speech-to-text pipeline, and did a great job.
I rate Trango Tech 10/10; they swiftly managed our project from strategy to rollout. While most AI projects end up abandoned, they covered training and change-management loops as well to ensure 80% adoption.
Unlike most OpenAI development companies, we clearly define your IP rights, data privacy, and exit strategies right from the start. We put them in writing on every SOW, so you have total peace of mind.
All code, prompts, eval sets, fine-tuned weights, and architecture artifacts produced under this engagement vest in Client on payment. Trango retains no license-back.
Client data, embeddings, and derived artifacts are deleted on engagement close with written certification within 14 days.No training on your data.
Trango will not use Client data to train models for any other client, internal R&D, or portfolio assets. Provider tier settings explicitly disable training.
Clients may terminate at the Eval Gate for any reason; Trango ships golden set + eval harness + IaC + runbooks regardless. 90-day data-portability commitment.
Hop on a 30-minute intro call with the principal who will stick by your side from week zero all the way to cutover.
We love showing off what we can do with OpenAI, though we have 11 more projects under NDA. Our portfolio covers the real-world impact we have made in healthcare, finance, retail, manufacturing, legal, & SaaS.
Financial Services · RAG
14-week build. GPT-5 + Claude Sonnet fallback using LiteLLM. Share policy + claims history on RAG. Hallucination was found at 0.6% on a 5,000-case golden set. SR 11-7 binder shipped.
Legal · GPT-5 + Claude
The playbook for 240 firm-standard positions is used for clause extraction + deviation flagging. On each flag, a citation. Claude Sonnet 4.5 for code paths and GPT-5 for general. Diagnostic was the winner over fine-tune in the composition of buy-with-RAG.
B2B SaaS · Wrapper Rescue
Legacy implemented a GPT-3.5 wrapper from a previous vendor. Halve hallucinations in 9 weeks: 8.4% → 1.1%. Enhanced PORTABILITY LAYER, EVAL HARNESS, and OWASP HARDENING. After the demise of GPT-4o.
More case studies under NDA — ask for the deck.
Most OpenAI dev firms won’t tell you their pilot-to-production ratio. We tell you ours, then refresh it every quarter. Four numbers in the running average across all 2024–2026 engagements.
“Three firms pitched us GPT wrappers in a deck. Trango showed up with an eval harness and asked for our golden set. We knew within 20 minutes they were the only ones who’d actually shipped one of these.”
Something that makes us a top choice for OpenAI Product Development is our commitment to quality and excellence. With our two decades of total experience, we know what works for AI and what doesn't. Besides that, there are six other reasons why our clients love working with us:
Our OpenAI developers work with a very unique approach. Before any code goes to production, we pass our 7-axis evaluation harness. If it fails, it doesn't ship.
We design abstractions like LiteLLM and Vercel AI SDK into your architecture. In case models get deprecated, you remain unaffected without the panic.
Trango Tech offers a 90-day notice on any provider deprecation that includes migration as well. If a swap is needed, we cover the costs, not you.
Unlike others who assign you random staff, we provide you with a dedicated team of engineers, designers, and developers. No team changes, unless you want it.
With a massive failure rate of nearly half of projects, we invert those statistics with experience. Our success rate is documented, audited, and updated.
Consider the stringent security and compliance we have been through, including OWASP LLM risk. Everything we do aligns with your compliance requirements.
If one of these six matches your need — let’s talk. Free 30-minute call. NDA on day one. No deck, no BDR.
Honesty has always been our core policy. If at any moment we aren’t the perfect fit for your project, we will tell you immediately. Based on diverse experience, we know where we deliver massive value. If not, we will refer you to someone who can better serve your needs. Check out situations where our OpenAI Development Agency can turn down your project:
If you simply consider this a temporary marketing feature and then it will be forgotten, you don't need to hire a full-service OpenAI development firm. It's a waste of your money and our process.
Production-grade AI takes time. Data preparation, building evaluation metrics, and security hardening can be tough. Even with a massive budget, we won't take on projects destined to fail due to a rush.
For those who are months away from signing a data protection agreement or master services agreement, you are making an early start. We recommend clearing those internal legal hurdles first and getting back to us.
Don't come to us if your board told you to get an OpenAI project. A project without real passion likely ends up being canceled. We have walked away from 14 projects so far at this stage, since they never made sense.
Have a question we missed? Drop it in the discovery call. We'll get you the answer and add it to our list.
Having an independent developer typically means having someone who knows a lot about coding or setting up an API. However, in a complex situation, you will likely feel a need to hire a firm with good hands in AI and ace at production. More than that, we have a whole integrated team. It involves a devoted data engineer for complex vector pipelines, an AI architect to define the orchestration logic, a UI/UX engineer, and, last but not least, a QA engineer with a keen eye, 100% focused on evaluating behavior. Don't stick with freelancers who have limited expertise in scaling, securing, and monitoring; hire us now.
The cost of a production-ready OpenAI system varies significantly depending on the amount and complexity of your data architecture and required integration. It ultimately ranges between $40,000 and more than $150,000.
You should expect anywhere between 8 and 16 weeks from discovery to full production audit. First, we validate the core logic using real data. The other two-thirds of the timeline solely focus on the hard work to make the data pipelines a viable corporate asset. In the end, we do ongoing testing suites to prevent regressions, optimizing latencies and security flaws.
We don't make an architectural decision that we are going to keep this LLM forever. Instead, it is used as a commodity that can be plugged in wherever we want. For complex agentic workflows, OpenAI continues to be a standard for raw reasoning capabilities, precise data outputs, and trusted tool execution. But in cases where your system needs to process very large contexts, such as one with many millions of tokens, you could consider using Anthropic or Google Gemini as additional nodes.
To avoid deprecation anxiety, we don't directly depend on particular model names, but rather build on an orchestration layer. We automatically send each model upgrade through our evaluation suites, as newer models may interpret the prompts differently or format the tool calls in a different way.
It's possible to be fully compliant with major security and regulatory systems through OpenAI systems, as long as the data architecture is designed accordingly. OpenAI also provides strong Business Associate Agreements for HIPAA compliance, promises not to store user data on API endpoints, and assures that user data will never be used to train public models.
For 95% of business use cases, we strongly recommend RAG and advanced prompt engineering, as this enables you to add dynamic and real-time business context and corporate data without incurring the massive overhead of training models. Remember that the process of fine-tuning means your model is being taught a new formatting style, tone, or a very specific syntax.
Trango Tech prevents hallucinations by developing solid math foundations, semantic constraints, and output verification. We are using an advanced RAG model that tells the OpenAI model to answer the question only using verified chunks of text retrieved from your private, internal data stores, and explicitly state when necessary.
Our Eval Gate is a paradigm we have shifted from manual, subjective AI testing to continuous, automated regression protection. It automatically collects trace data from actual production failure events, converts those failure cases into a permanent test case, and executes them within your automated deployment system without relying on human developers to manually test prompts and then check if it failed an edge case.
All assets developed during our engagement are yours and are developed under a clear work-for-hire contract. This encompasses the main application source code, the tailored data processing pipelines, system prompts, agentic routing graphs, and, crucially, the evaluation datasets and regression suites developed during the course of development.
Although search and chat RAG systems are good for basic document retrieval, we are more interested in setting up complex engineering agentic workflows. An agentic system doesn't simply respond to questions. It cycles through a series of steps, thinks about an open-ended goal, selects the tools it needs outside of the system, validates its own results, and independently corrects errors until it arrives at a successful conclusion.
Luckily, many of our enterprise projects are those that worked great as a prototype, but failed under production traffic. If an AI system starts to become slow, unpredictable, and too costly to scale, we come in to audit the whole pipeline. We break down over-engineered prompt chains and replace them with structured agentic loops. Then optimize database indexing, eliminate data retrieval inaccuracies, and create clear observability monitoring. As a result, it becomes quite easy to identify where your tokens, latency, and accuracy are leaking.
Our pricing is designed to be transparent, flexible, and responsive at all stages of the system's life cycle. The initial investments are on a well-defined, fixed-fee basis, and we work with you to scope the system for the first time to cover core architectural definitions, prototype construction, and initial system scoping, so that your leadership team knows what the initial investment is going to cover.
Yes, of course, we fully support isolated, on-premise, or even sovereign cloud deployments. We often use secure enterprise cloud services, such as Azure OpenAI or AWS Bedrock, but we have full capabilities to design the whole data pipeline, orchestration middleware, and vector storage engines in your own physical data centers or private cloud regions.
Question not answered above? A principal — not a BDR — will reply within 1 business day. Same-day if urgent.
Throughout this resource, you will encounter specific industry jargon, technical phrases, and core concepts.
Most clients kick things off with our diagnostic call. Others prefer to dive straight into a Strategy Sprint, while some bring us in mid-flight to help unstuck a PoC. Just pick the option that works best for you.
A principal strolls through your use case, data, compliance position, and current position. You depart with a written summary and a tier recommendation! No deck.
Calculate your monthly token costs for OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemini. Raises the bar on the risk of an inversion before undertaking a negative unit economics project.
Run Calculator2 weeks diagnostic + architecture + ROI model. Contains a provider recommendation, golden-set v0, OWASP map, and a buy/build/RAG/fine-tune decision binder.